Windows Copilot AI will eventually run on GeForce RTX GPUs

Daniel Sims

Posts: 1,434   +44
Staff
The big picture: Microsoft, Intel, AMD, and Qualcomm recently presented their plans to introduce "AI PCs" leveraging neural processing units NPUs for onboard generative AI, primarily through Microsoft's Copilot AI assistant. However, AI industry leader Nvidia believes its RTX graphics chips are better suited to the task. Among the company's announcements is a confirmation that Microsoft and Nvidia are collaborating to enable Copilot to utilize RTX hardware.

Developers creating Windows apps that leverage generative AI will soon gain access to an API for running GPU-accelerated small language models through the Windows Copilot Runtime. The collaboration between Microsoft and Nvidia will allow Copilot and related generative AI applications to run on both NPUs and RTX GPUs, potentially bringing locally processed AI workloads to more PCs.

The centerpiece of Computex this year has arguably been the AI PC, highlighted by presentations of upcoming processors from Intel, AMD, and Qualcomm. One of the main selling points of new chip lineups like Intel's Lunar Lake, AMD's Strix Point, and Qualcomm's Snapdragon X is how well their NPUs handle generative AI applications without total dependence on cloud servers. NPUs are central to the new AI PC specifications defined by Microsoft and Intel. Apple is expected to present similar plans at WWDC next week.

Predictably, Nvidia prefers that its GPUs become the popular platform for client-side AI. In a recent internal presentation, the company claimed that entry-level and mid-range RTX 4000 graphics cards can process AI several times faster than the latest NPUs from CPU designers. Nvidia's biggest advantage is that, while the competition has yet to launch its new AI PCs or convince customers to buy them, RTX GPUs are already installed in millions of systems worldwide.

However, the range of "RTX AI PC" applications is currently limited to features like DLSS in video games, streaming audio enhancements, and Nvidia's chatbot. Enabling Copilot to exploit this hardware might expand the range of use cases and bring the full suite of Microsoft's AI assistant to more PCs. Nvidia also recently unveiled an AI-based gaming assistant, similar to the Copilot assistant that Microsoft previously revealed.

The AI PC showcases have largely focused on APUs and integrated graphics, but Nvidia also presented a series of "RTX AI" laptops from MSI and Asus, combining the new AMD CPUs with the mobile RTX 4070. These are sure to be the first of many devices to run Copilot on both NPUs and GPUs. Similar Lunar Lake-based systems will inevitably follow.

Moreover, Nvidia and Dell recently hinted that they might unveil an AI PC-related collaboration next year. The plans could involve AI PCs with RTX GPUs, but an Arm-based CPU or APU from Nvidia isn't out of the question.

Permalink to story:

 
I'm not sure I honestly care about running AI on my PC.
I have run open source models and it's fine, I can be quite productive with it. My problem is I don't want to be running Microsoft's AI on my PC. The crap they pull with Windows 11 is bad enough, I don't trust their AI at all, and even if I did, it would probably nag me every 5 minutes extolling the virtues of Edge.
 
So all the AI hype is only to use the hardware for the Copilot ? Anyone can show me how effective Copilot is ? I have never encountered the needs to use it
 
So all the AI hype is only to use the hardware for the Copilot ? Anyone can show me how effective Copilot is ? I have never encountered the needs to use it
AI use isn't a need, There's no need to use it, however, that was never the intention, hence why it's called "Copilot" and not "Pilot".

I've used Microsoft 365 Copilot for a few weeks and it's not "needed", what it does (or can do) is speed up certain repetitive tasks or assist in creating things. I can give examples but ultimately, it's not "needed" there's no requirement for it (yet), it's just a nice-to-have IF (big if here) you have a work flow that could save time and benefit from Copilot.

Copilot built into Windows though? Honestly unsure how useful this really is, Windows is very easy to use, asking Copilot "how do I uninstall Edge" vs using a search engine, I highly doubt Copilot is any quicker.

Maybe Microsoft have found something it's quicker or better at, hard to say until I get my hands on it.
 
So all the AI hype is only to use the hardware for the Copilot ? Anyone can show me how effective Copilot is ? I have never encountered the needs to use it

I use AI daily, bing chat and github copilot. I use it when I have questions and I don't want to bother people with them or when I have simple tasks that can take a while if done manually. I also use it to get new ideas to solve issues or get the current state of best practices.

I wouldn't say it's perfect but it definitely saves me a lot of time.
 
"AI" is already on most electronic devices everyone owns.....

Which is believable if you accept the definition of what these companies call "AI".

Got a smartphone? I know with my Samsung S8 it has some "AI" on it. One of the "AI" features is that the phone pays attention to apps that I use and when I use them so it can make a guess as having the set of app icons up on the screen so I don't have to search for them. According to these companies that would now be considered "AI".

I'm so far ahead of everyone else when it comes to being hip with "AI" because my 7 year old phone has it! Suck it everyone! My phone has been "AI" capable for over half a decade! You all suck and I rule!

No one in their right mind thinks that "AI" is actual AI. Also, no one in their right mind wants this intrusive crap running on their system.
 
Last edited:
Back