Patriot showcases DDR5 that overclocks to 11,500 MT/s

Daniel Sims

Posts: 1,434   +44
Staff
Forward-looking: DDR5 memory and PCIe 5.0 storage solutions have pushed consumer hardware to unprecedented speeds since their introduction with the latest motherboards. At Computex 2024, Patriot demonstrated how it leveraged this technology for bleeding-edge products, including a partnership with MSI to achieve a record-breaking RAM overclock.

Patriot's booth at Computex showcased the company's new ultra-fast RAM and SSD, both reaching the highest speed tiers of their respective categories. The memory modules set new records for consumer RAM.

Patriot collaborated with MSI to unveil the Viper Xtreme 5 RGB DDR5 MPower series. Under normal operation, the RAM modules can reach up to 8,000 MT/s – typical of DDR5. However, overclocking pushes the ECC RDIMM modules to an unprecedented 11,500 MT/s.

MSI supplied an all-silver aluminum heat spreader to control thermals at those speeds, and the EZ Dashboard overclocking utility for timing and voltage management. For comparison, G.Skill and Asus worked together to overclock a DDR5 kit to 10,000 MT/s in 2022 but could only achieve the feat through settings unlikely to see real-world use.

Patriot claims the new precedent in RAM speed will help with video editing, AI, workloads, and gaming. However, most high-end games can still run optimally on DDR4 memory, which remains much cheaper and supports a wider range of motherboards.

Still, JEDEC is pushing further with DDR6, which is still deep in development. The upcoming standard won't reach consumers for a while but might enable speeds up to 21,000 MT/s.

Meanwhile, Patriot also showcased the Viper PV573 PCIe 5.0 NVMe SSD at Computex. It supports read speeds of up to 14 GB/s and write speeds of up to 12 GB/s. While other PCIe 5.0 drives have hit similar speeds, 14 GB/s remains at the absolute cutting edge.

Notably, Patriot didn't display a gargantuan cooler, which other SSDs exceeding 10 GB/s have needed to avoid severe throttling. At last year's Computex, Adata showed a 14 GB/s SSD that required a liquid cooling solution which dwarfed the main unit. Patriot's real achievement might be maintaining top-end speeds with a more reasonably sized heatsink.

The company has yet to disclose pricing and release details, but the PV573 will be available in capacities up to 4TB. A DRAMless model for mobile devices – the PD573 – reaches the same speeds with sizes up to 16TB. The Viper Xtreme 5 RAM will support configurations of up to 48 GB.

Permalink to story:

 
Registered RAM performance is generally slow because the memory has to perform additional checking on the data to fix any 1-bit errors, high number of MT/s don't mean anything because unregistered not-ECC RAM will stomp it, even if it's MT/s is far lower than the RDIMM's. and also: much of that high MT/s is not real (memory is probably being corrected to mask the 1-bit errors from the OC), and last: registered memory is intended for applications where corruption is unacceptable, overclocking it is counter productive to it's purpose (for the chance that the OC may damage bytes beyond the 1-bit limit of the correction system to be able to correct) :(
 
I recently saw DDR5 10500MT/s @ CL56 with an X870 board and 8700G.
I don't see anything from DDR5 and current and next Gen IMC's that is reason to move from the 6000MT/s CL30 sweet spot or from DIMM to CAMM2. Def want to see 3rd party comparisons on the latter. My expectations are very low that it's noticably better than DIMM's in speed and latency.
 
Registered RAM performance is generally slow because the memory has to perform additional checking on the data to fix any 1-bit errors, high number of MT/s don't mean anything because unregistered not-ECC RAM will stomp it, even if it's MT/s is far lower than the RDIMM's. and also: much of that high MT/s is not real (memory is probably being corrected to mask the 1-bit errors from the OC), and last: registered memory is intended for applications where corruption is unacceptable, overclocking it is counter productive to it's purpose (for the chance that the OC may damage bytes beyond the 1-bit limit of the correction system to be able to correct) :(
While that is mostly true, there are still plenty of benefits form OCing registered RAM…
I run a threadripper 7980x - with 64gb of registered ram (all threadripper ram must be registered)…. When doing certain loads, I can get plenty of “free” performance by OCing my ram up to 6ghz (or higher)…
 
Yhe, but if you would have buyed non-ECC platform your memory performance would be mutch higher than it :) it hard to give exact numbers, but I think non-ECC RAM would be faster down to around 4500 mhz compared to 6000 registered more or less, but it realy depend on the application, today you can get fast DDR4 at 128 GB and DDR5 non-ECC up to 64 GB (only 2 sticks, and try to make sure they are single rank, because DDR5 density is still terable :( mobos claim to able to hit 256 GB DDR5 density but in reality you need EtE support for that (all components must be able: the RAM the IMC the IF and the mobo) - but that never hapen in reality :( I know that both Z690 and 790 have problems with high density DDR5, AMD have their own problems with RAM with that agesa.... the funny story is that I am running 64 GB DDR3 on a Phenom 2 x6 1100T so it's strange that 2 generations newer technology like DDR5 is nothing special in terms of density :(
 
Yhe, but if you would have buyed non-ECC platform your memory performance would be mutch higher than it :) it hard to give exact numbers, but I think non-ECC RAM would be faster down to around 4500 mhz compared to 6000 registered more or less, but it realy depend on the application, today you can get fast DDR4 at 128 GB and DDR5 non-ECC up to 64 GB (only 2 sticks, and try to make sure they are single rank, because DDR5 density is still terable :( mobos claim to able to hit 256 GB DDR5 density but in reality you need EtE support for that (all components must be able: the RAM the IMC the IF and the mobo) - but that never hapen in reality :( I know that both Z690 and 790 have problems with high density DDR5, AMD have their own problems with RAM with that agesa.... the funny story is that I am running 64 GB DDR3 on a Phenom 2 x6 1100T so it's strange that 2 generations newer technology like DDR5 is nothing special in terms of density :(
My memory performance yes… but find me an equivalent CPU that uses non-reg RAM…
 
Back